3
« on: June 14, 2013, 12:43:42 am »
Hello again, to that one guy who seems to be answering all the support questions,
I have a rather vague, amateur question to ask, as I am one of those "developers" biting of more than they can chew.
My childhood dream has always been to make the next best RTS modeled after WarCraft 2, an orthographic, top down, simple sprite-based game, and until Unity came around I never seemed to have the ability to bring that dream to fruition. Now that I can, and now that I'm equipped with both Unity and the highly acclaimed 2D toolkit, I've been dabbling and rejoicing in my minor successes -- so I must ask for for you to indulge me for the moment, as apart from a decent foundation in C# and Javascript, I am certainly a beginner.
My question lies in the overall ideal structure of a 2D RTS. Dabbling with Unity I've been able to create a plane the size of the release target resolution, and a camera that is directed perfectly at it. With the addition of 2D toolkit, I have been able to make a 32bit grid of terrain sprites to serve as the backdrop, with the intentions of creating the UI in between the camera and the tilemap. Here's where I hit a wall. I understand how to go about creating objects in 3D space in order to give them each their own attributes and functions, but as far as a tilemap goes, I am uncertain.
My question is what would be the best way to go about implementing an interactive set of sprites in a way that also allows me to treat them as independent objects. Should I simply create the individual sprites to move around in free space? Should I continue to use a tilemap? Is there a way to place objects on a tilemap and to be able to assign them properties and scripts, as you would in 3D?
Hopefully you understand my confusion, but I would imagine a well thought out answer from an expert would certainly put my back on track.
My apologies if I seem entirely too underequipped to take on such a project, bare with me.
- Brian Jenkins
Show Posts
