1
Support / Re: Top-down Tilemap colliders
« on: September 22, 2013, 05:25:00 pm »
This makes sense. Thanks!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Support / Top-down Tilemap colliders
« on: September 21, 2013, 11:29:44 pm »
Hello,
We recently started working on a 2D top-down game using the 2D Toolkit, but we're having some trouble setting up the colliders that go with the tilemap. To make it top-down, we've rotated the tile-map 90 degrees around the x-axis, as well as the tk2d camera. We then set the collider type for each of the sprites to box trimmed, and set the collider depth to 20. When we run the game with a cube that has a rigid-body, though, it doesn't detect the collisions (the cube falls through the tile-map). It kind of seems like mesh colliders are rotated incorrectly. So i f we go in and replace the mesh collider for the tile map render data with a box collider, however, it suddenly works. It seems like manually going in and replacing the mesh collider like this is bad. Is there a better way to do this?
We recently started working on a 2D top-down game using the 2D Toolkit, but we're having some trouble setting up the colliders that go with the tilemap. To make it top-down, we've rotated the tile-map 90 degrees around the x-axis, as well as the tk2d camera. We then set the collider type for each of the sprites to box trimmed, and set the collider depth to 20. When we run the game with a cube that has a rigid-body, though, it doesn't detect the collisions (the cube falls through the tile-map). It kind of seems like mesh colliders are rotated incorrectly. So i f we go in and replace the mesh collider for the tile map render data with a box collider, however, it suddenly works. It seems like manually going in and replacing the mesh collider like this is bad. Is there a better way to do this?
Pages: [1]